Today in this article we’ll discuss the Top 10 controversial Umpiring decisions in IPL 2024. Even though we have come ahead so much in technology, sometimes even the TV Umpire also fail to give right decision. These are fee of the bad Umpiring decisions of IPL 2024 that were hated by both players and fans alike. So let’s have a look at Top 10 Umpiring decisions in IPL 2024.
Also Read:-
Top International Cricket Controversies: Match-Fixing, Ball-Tampering, and More
1. Sanju Samson dismissal (DC vs RR, Match No.56)
The most controversial umpiring decision in the IPL 2024 was the Samson incident. The RR captain Sanju Samson was in a great form and had made a great partnership with Riyan paraag Jos Butler and Shubham Dubey. However in the 16th over when Samson hit a boundary Shai hope took the catch. However he was very close to the boundary line and there was no way of knowing for the ground Umpire to check whether his foot was touching the boundary or not. Moreover the TV Umpire also stated that it was a clean catch and gave Sanju out. However when the replace started it was seeing that the catch was in clean and there was some margin for a boundary. However the umpires remained on their decisions. This is surely one of the top 5 most controversial Umpiring decisions in IPL 2024
2. Virat Kohli’s dismissal (KKR vs RCB, Match No.36)
Another great controversial decision by Umpires in IPL 2024 was the dismissal of Virat Kohli against KKR. Kholi while chasing a huge target was off to a great start however in the third over a ball way above his waist line came and when he tried to hit the catch was caught. The ground Umpire sent it to the TV Umpire and there it was said that he was out of the crease and it was cleared out. However, the players, the fans and the cricket analysts were not happy with this decision as it was a clear no ball from their side.
3. Wide call against Mohit Sharma (RR vs GT, Match No.24)
Now another controversial umpiring decision in IPL 2024 is related to wide balls. In this particular case it is related to the match Between Rajasthan Royal and Gujarat Titans. While Sanju Samson was batting in 17th over bowlers bowled a ball that was given wide by the on field umpire. Unsatisfied with the decision the GT captain took a review stating that the Samson was way ahead the off stump and the delivery was correct. The TV Umpire first Stated that it was not a wide ball however with further replays he stayed with the original decision of the ball being wide.
4. Wide call against Ishant Sharma (LSG vs DC, Match No.26)
On April 12, LSG had won the toss and elected to bat first against DC. Veteran bowler Ishant Sharma beat Devdutt Padikkal down the leg side with an angled delivery from around the wicket in the fourth over. After calling it wide, the on-field umpire motioned for DC to review. Pant was spotted chatting with the on-field umpire after the television umpire held up the appeal submission. It was later revealed that Pant was wondering why the third umpire chose not to look at ultra edge, despite the initial appearance that the DC skipper had no want to accept the review and was upset over having unintentionally lost one.
5. Ayush Badoni run out (MI vs LSG, Match No.48)
Another control version comparing decisions in the IPL 2024 was a run out decision against the LSG. Here the over was bowled by the MI captain Hardik Pandya in the 19th over when Lucknow needed 13 of 12 to win. There was a chance for two runs and the Lucknow batsmen took it , the wicket keeper Ishan Kishan received the ball but was able to hit the bails Faster and the batsmen was well into the crease. However the TV Umpire was not satisfied with this and rechecked it and gave the batsmen out.
So these were the Top 5 Controversial umpiring decisions in IPL 2024. We hope that you have got all the information that you were hoping for.Â
FAQs:-
- What are umpiring decisions in cricket?
- Umpiring decisions refer to the judgments made by the on-field and TV umpires regarding various aspects of the game, including dismissals, boundary calls, and wide deliveries.
- Why do umpiring decisions sometimes spark controversy?
- Umpiring decisions can spark controversy when there is disagreement between players, fans, and officials regarding the correctness or fairness of the decision, often due to human error or interpretation.
- How are umpiring decisions reviewed in the IPL?
- In the IPL, umpiring decisions can be reviewed by the TV umpire using technology such as replays, ball-tracking, and ultra-edge to ensure accuracy in crucial situations.
- What happens if a team disagrees with an umpiring decision?
- If a team disagrees with an umpiring decision, they have the option to request a review through the Decision Review System (DRS), which allows for a second opinion on the decision.
- Can umpiring decisions be overturned after review?
- Yes, umpiring decisions can be overturned after review if the evidence presented through technology proves that the original decision was incorrect.
- Who makes the final decision on umpiring reviews in the IPL?
- The final decision on umpiring reviews in the IPL is typically made by the TV umpire, who assesses the evidence provided by various technological tools.
- What are some common types of controversial umpiring decisions in cricket?
- Common types of controversial umpiring decisions in cricket include disputed catches, lbw (leg before wicket) calls, run-out decisions, and wide deliveries.
- How do umpires ensure fairness and accuracy in their decisions?
- Umpires strive to ensure fairness and accuracy in their decisions by undergoing rigorous training, staying updated on the rules, and utilizing technology for reviews when necessary.
- What role does technology play in umpiring decisions in modern cricket?
- Technology, such as ball-tracking systems, ultra-edge, and slow-motion replays, plays a crucial role in assisting umpires in making accurate decisions, especially in high-stakes matches like the IPL.
- Are there any measures in place to improve umpiring standards in the IPL?
- Yes, the IPL continuously evaluates and implements measures to improve umpiring standards, including training programs, performance assessments, and the use of advanced technology for reviews.